Adding up to our posts on foreign direct investments in agriculture, the Surrey International Law Centre and the Environmental Regulatory Research Group just published a fact-finding report on the so-called ‘land-grab’ which will be used as a basis for a more in-depth piece of research.

The abstract reads as follows, and the full document can be found here.

Following the 2008 world food crisis, many international investors have engaged in a race for land acquisition and food production. This new form of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is increasingly criticised in the public sphere, which commonly refers to it as a ‘land grab’.

In the absence of consequent primary sources relating to the subject matter, however, this working document provides an overview of what the authors describe as an ‘agri-FDI’ trend, based on the cross analysis of secondary sources. It first draws a geographical map of the trend as a means to emphasise who invests and where. Second, it considers the origins of the trend are, including the 2008 food crises and the impact of increased demand for biofuel. This document, overall, constitutes the basis of a forthcoming paper which, in turn, will formulate hypotheses and questions as to whether agriculture-oriented investments differ from traditional FDI.

A. Martin and M. Ayalew, Acquiring Land Abroad for Agricultural Purposes: ‘Land Grab’ or Agri-Fdi? Report of the Surrey International Law Centre and Environmental Regulatory Research Group (March 2011). Surrey Law Working Papers – 08/2011 Available on SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1788948

Advertisements

Adding up to the ‘Agri-FDI’ section of the International Law Notepad, we are re-publishing a communication of the Ethiopian Government regarding investments in land.

Development or Exploitation? Foreign Investment in Ethiopia’s Agriculture

(MoFA, Mar 04, 2011)- Ethiopia’s development strategy and policies have resulted in double digit economic growth for the past seven years. Last year it also launched the ambitious but achievable Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP) to sustain the momentum of this growth through the next five years. A major element in the plan is agriculture and agro-processing. Agriculture remains one of the mainstays of the economy and the main source of employment and foreign exchange, and the government has committed itself to promote and attract potential investors to participate in agricultural investment with a variety of incentive packages as well as transparent policies, laws, regulations and procedures. Ethiopia is of course politically, socially and macro-economically stable; it has significant market opportunities, an abundant and trainable labor force, and diversified agro-ecological zones.

Read the rest of this entry »

In a recent article, Arjen Y. Hoekstra, professor in water resources management at the University of Twente (the Netherlands) comments on today’s practices towards water consumption.

Prof. Hoekstra recalls that although many political efforts are made to minimize domestic water consumption, agricultural practices and animal products “are by far the greater danger” for only 5 per cent of our water consumption might be related to domestic water consumption and 10 per cent industrial products.

About 85 per cent of  water consumption by contrast,would therefore be related to agricultural and animal uses. Animal consumption however, might not be related to the amount of drank water, but rather to the quantities needed to grow animals’ food.

Read the rest of this entry »

As a result of the 2008 world food crisis, many investors have engaged into a race for food production also known as ‘landgrab’. (See for instance here) That being said, it is interesting to note that although many press and NGO comments can be found on the net, very few official sources can be relied upon in order to draw reliable trends.

First, the ‘langrab’ issue importantly illustrates a general malaise as to the increasing demand for food in times where the means to anwer such a demand are limited. Second, the point allows suggesting that to some extend, the ability of money-rich states to acquire land in money-poor but land-rich states generates many issues. In many cases indeed, harvests may be integrally repatriated to the home-states’ markets, while host-states by contrast remain reliant on international food-aid. Problematically however, the ‘landgrab’ debate by putting the blame on foreign investors tends to fail to consider the very origins of such a trend. At this point, it is indeed difficult to find neutral reports and comments in which the “why” prevails on the “what”. While it should be recalled that Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) are vehicules for development-funding which should be distinguished from greed, this essential aspect of the trend is hardly considered.

The Int’l Law Notepad therefore intends to open its columns to such a debate, and an ‘agri-FDI’ category is now available for this purpose. Notes should follow as soon as possible.

%d bloggers like this: